IEPs must be based on accurate, objective, and measurable data to identify student needs and guide educational decisions.
When data is unclear, incomplete, or not measurable, the IEP may not be reasonably calculated to enable meaningful progress, as required under Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, which held that an IEP must be “reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child’s circumstances.”
In addition, public schools must ensure that students with disabilities are not excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity, as required under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Goals are not written in a way that can be objectively measured
Goals are not clearly connected to the student’s identified needs
Goals are overly broad or combine multiple skill areas
Progress cannot be clearly tracked over time
Progress is described using general narrative statements instead of using objective data
Progress monitoring lacks consistent, measurable criteria
Data does not show whether the student is making progress
Progress reports do not align with stated goals
Present levels do not include objective, baseline data
Strengths and needs are not clearly identified
Areas of concern are not addressed
Data is missing, outdated, or not tied to educational performance
When These Patterns Occur
The student’s needs may not be clearly identified
Goals may not address the student’s actual needs
Progress may not be accurately measured
Educational decisions may not be fully informed
Legal Foundations
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act requires:
Measurable annual goals and a way to track progress (34 C.F.R. § 300.320)
Accurate present levels of academic achievement and functional performance
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504:
Students must have an equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from educational programs (28 C.F.R. § 35.130; 34 C.F.R. § 104.4)
When data is unclear or incomplete:
Access to appropriate instruction may be limited
Progress may not be meaningful or measurable
Educational decisions may not address the student’s needs
When the IEP is not based on clear, objective, and measurable data, meaningful progress—and access to appropriate education—may be affected.